By Sensei Guy Hagen, April 22, 2018

How To Train For A Million Years, Part 2

This the second part of a two-part article, “How To Train For A Million Years.” You can read the first part of the article here.

As human beings, we have a finite amount of time that we can spend improving our martial arts through keiko, and this creates an absolute limit to how much we can learn in one lifetime.   In the first part of this article, Saotome Sensei explained that investing ourselves completely in our training as if each moment was our last; by balancing strength with relaxation, attentiveness with “letting go”, tension and freedom, we can manifest ourselves fully and tap into the hidden aspects of in our potential.  In this second article, Sensei explains how each of us are the products of millions of years of evolution, and that when we attack and defend we are in fact relying heavily on instincts, reflexes, and movement chains that have been provided by Nature.  Although we tend to think of these things as under our constant conscious control, they are not and cannot be.  Sensei describes how we should change our training from repetition to exploration, and discovering the underlying principles of biofeedback and movement that provide a gateway to more powerful and astonishing Aikido technique.

Practical Considerations: Opposition Reflex and Proprioception

Technique and biofeedback should be the same thing.  Sensei asks, “when we are training, doing keiko, are we letting Uke’s natural response happen?  Or are we fighting with them, attempting to force Uke into a shape against their will?  Your attacker will never obey you!  When we practice technique, we must learn to feel and anticipate and work with uke’s natural movement, reflexes, and instinct to oppose what they feel we are doing.  This is ‘biofeedback’, and we perceive it with our skin, not our eyes.  Do you know, the skin is the original brain?” At this, Sensei is referring to single cell life forms and simple animals like worms, with little to no central nervous system but instead rely upon their skin (or membrane) to sense and respond to their environment.  Touch response times can be twice as fast (or faster) than visual response times, especially for “muscle memory” responses.  “There are no mistakes, there are only reactions and changes.  Only opportunities. Any response from Uke is a successful manifestation of aiki, and Nage should be prepared to fit with it and fill it.”

“The skin is the original brain, it is the seat of our true perception and purest response.”

The best stuff happens below the surface.  Sensei likes to do a brief demonstration of biofeedback, where he has Uke make a fist and hold a strong “punch” stance.  By adding a slight pressure down or forward, then releasing it, Sensei can clearly demonstrate a corrective response by Uke that ends up with a small over-correction or oscillation in Uke’s arm. Sometimes Sensei then uses that response to guide the fist in, or down, or out, to cause Uke to fall from what would appear to be an otherwise solid stance.  Clearly, Uke didn’t intentionally over-correct; they intentionally set up a physical condition (hold this pose, resist changes), and part of their non-analytical / non-intentional mind strove to correct Sensei’s interference in a way that happened to manifest as an over-correction.  This is sometimes referred to as opposition reflex; instinctually, Uke responds to counter any pressure or motion they feel from Nage.  Sensei wants us to find and integrate this type of response every time we touch Uke.  Of course, it relies on Uke committing to the attack and contributing to the training without trying to create feedback or trying to help Nage.  “Uke is very important.  Creating the icho go ichi e moment is the essence of ukemi.  Ukemi is not just physical; Uke shares responsibility for creating martial intensity in the keiko moment.  As much attention, as much tension is required of Uke as is required of Nage.”

 

Saotome Sensei talking about “biofeedback response” at the 12th Street Dojo in Sarasota, Florida.

To “wrap my head” around Sensei’s “biofeedback” principle, to find a framework for explaining what is happening and a direction of exploration, I have started to investigate the concept of proprioception. Proprioception, in simple, is your body’s mechanism for monitoring, measuring and controlling its position in space, and the force exerted by and felt by your muscles.  You have sensors inside your muscles that relay feedback on weight (heaviness), and the contraction/use of your muscles – in essence, where your body is and what your body is doing, and whether or not it is performing as expected with or without conscious monitoring.  Proprioception is tied closely with muscle memory and unconscious movement, even to a certain extent our sense of balance and our ability to accurately interact with our environment.  When there is a dysfunction with our proprioception, we may have difficulty walking, we may be clumsy or use too much force, and we have difficulty matching our movements to our intentions.


How opposition response – biofeedback – can result in dramatic technique

We all have to use the programs that Evolution gave us. From a martial standpoint, there is a transition between intentional goal setting and execution by your body that is handled by proprioception.  There is one proprioception experiment that I found very informative, and which I think illuminates the opportunity for martial study.  In this experiment, a subway stairwell was altered so that a single step was raised 1/2″ (about 12mm) from all the others, and the stairwell was filmed so that the responses of random people going up and down the stairs would be recorded.  Unsurprisingly, a great majority of people tripped or stumbled on the odd step, even though the offending step was not actually high enough to interfere with the pedestrians’ feet.  What happened was that at the beginning of the steps, the pedestrians made an assessment of the stairwell (“normal stairwell, easy to navigate, consistent steps”) and put their feet on automatic pilot.  When there was a discrepancy – the sensors in the feet and leg reported that the initial assessment was incorrect – the normal ability to navigate and climb or descend the stairs was disrupted, and in fact they had a disproportionate stumbling disruption across their entire body.  1/2″ difference, no tripping – yet major stumbles!  In contrast, when one is trying to climb a rocky mountain path, one is less likely to stumble because the initial assessment sets the expectation that the footing will be unstable, and as a result we maintain a certain amount of attention, defensive control, adaptability, and response on our foot placement.  I think the implications of this are amazing!  To me, this indicates that as long as our attacker is encouraged to believe they do not need to pay attention to their hands, feet, or balance, they are susceptible to interruption and disruption effects; but if we cause them to be overly defensive and self-aware through forced movement, we may make our tasks as Nage harder.

Based on my reading and study of proprioception, I think it’s helpful to think of Uke’s goal-setting and proprioception process as a sequence captured by a sort of “computer program”:

  1. Uke wants to punch nage (establishes an objective).
  2. Uke assesses situation and collects variable inputs (Nage is positioned thusly; target is selected; necessary vector and force and timing identified to achieve goal).
  3. Uke executes “Punch To The Head” program (stance grounds, fist chambers; aligns; fist accelerates along designated path toward target; fist continues until target is struck, punch is completed, danger or program failure is detected).

Notice at Step 3, Uke is no longer focused on goals (what they want), but instead has translated the goal into physical actions that hopefully will achieve the desired goals (what they are actually asking for).  Once the program starts, and if the training situation is intense, Uke no longer has the mental bandwidth or even desire to continue controlling the fist through the punching process.  Instead, Uke must rely on the Punch program to execute successfully; and if they are a boxer or fighter or martial artist, they have repeated those motions thousands of times and have reached great confidence and reliance on that program.

To provide a visual explanation, the following flow chart shows my interpretation of the objective setting and proprioception execution sequence from a martial perspective:

My “programmer’s conception” of how proprioception works in a martial context

As long as we allow Uke’s Punch program to continue without receiving “major error” or “completion” signals, Uke should remain committed to that program.  The same is true for “walk forward to close distance”, or “execute block to protect from strike”, or “move body to recover balance and reorient on threat” programs – or in the case of Saotome Sensei’s demonstration, “stay strong/stable and don’t let the fist be moved” program. If Sensei used overwhelming force that made Uke’s goal state impossible (for example, by forcefully pressing Uke’s arm down with both of his arms, or by throwing Uke using their head/body), Uke would quit trying.  However, since Uke feels like they are continuing to succeed at keeping their posture and are so close to realigning their fist to the goal state, Sensei can continue to use Uke’s tiny overcorrections to disrupt their balance and structure.

Some of the things Sensei accomplishes with “biofeedback” are kuzushi (offbalancing, as I’ve just described), de-ai (gaining timing while Uke continues trying to complete an attack that can no longer succeed), suki (creating openings for striking or to gain the centerline), and even nagewaza (throwing, or disproportionate stumble / flinch / recovery response that results in Uke falling).  Sensei makes these happen by not disrupting these internal programs but also not letting them quite generate the desired objective, or sometimes by causing an over-reaction in the direction Sensei desires.

When it happens to you, it’s baffling. The proprioception model makes sense to me based upon my own experience attacking Sensei. There have been many times where I tried to give Sensei a powerful, committed yet responsive attack – a sincere attempt to hit him, but also attempting to be responsive and under control, to not to be a “sitting duck” or to punch blindly like a freight train.  During these times, I have often experienced a sensation of cognitive dissonance where Sensei moves, or changes the situation subtly,  in a way that for a fraction of a second I know analytically that my attack will fail, that I am doomed, yet I find myself unable to stop my movement or attack.  It is almost like I am briefly a passenger in my body, unable to change directions or to recall my attack.  At times, it is almost comical!  I know many of Saotome Sensei’s other students have experienced this, and you can even see it occur on some of his videos.  Many of the people who have been Sensei’s seminar Ukes will chuckle and share their own memories of the many times they thought to themselves, “I don’t know exactly what happened that time, maybe I tripped or was distracted at the wrong moment, but this time I am going to hit Sensei for sure!”

Of course, Saotome Sensei has never used the term “proprioception,” and he did not arrive at his understanding through a scientific analysis of muscle spindles, neuromotor sensors and biological kinesthetics.  Instead, he is a deeply intuitive and sensitive martial artist, and he gained his insight through watching people, feeling the responses of his training partners, and closely observing animals in nature respond to each other.  To him, “biofeedback” is another form of aiki; it is sensing the natural vibrations and energy of one’s opponent, and letting it express itself naturally while adapting it to another, more harmonious, goal.  Normally we think of this blending of energies in terms of great lines and spirals (external), but for Sensei the deeper expression of these lines and spirals is almost imperceptibly small and instantaneous and contained in the connection point between Uke and Nage.  To move our point of study – while still maintaining dynamic attack distances, speed and power – is to move our study from the external to the internal, from the manipulative to the responsive.

Traditional KeikoBiofeedback Keiko
External: large, visible interaction (perception by eyes)Internal: small, invisible interaction (perception by skin)
Footwork, major (long) muscle groupsPosture, core muscle groups / ligaments
Form is imposed on Uke despite their natural movementsTechnique takes advantage of Uke’s natural movements
Technique is based on large movements and manipulation of joints and bodyTechnique utilizes Uke’s micro-adjustments to maintain balance or movement
Repetition keikoIntuition keiko
Power / overwhelmingResponsiveness

Martial biofeedback is an immense topic that could provide decades of deep study, but Saotome Sensei urges us to consider it a gateway to a new way to train and even to think about our study of aiki.  As Sensei reminds us – “20 years, 30 years on the mat is no guarantee of your training.” Whether you approach it from an analytical direction as I have, or choose to explore it from a purely intuitive and sensitivity framework as Sensei has is up to you.

“How many billions of years did it take the universe to create Saotome?  This is my aiki heritage.  This is universal heritage. We are all born with aiki. Aiki is always there – just as you can’t stop breathing, you can’t not use aiki. We all contain the secret of aiki within us.  It is up to each of us to choose to unlock that secret.” – Shihan Mitsugi Saotome


Material from this article was collected over a number of interviews with Saotome Sensei, but most notably from a personal visit on 12/8/2015 (Sarasota), and at ASU Winter Intensive in St. Pete Beach (January 4-5 2018).  An additional quote was from Sensei’s instruction at 12th Street Dojo (Sarasota, Florida) on 3/11/2018.

3 comments on “How To Train For A Million Years, Part 2

  1. Great work, Guy. I really like how you organized and systematized sensei’s teachings on “biofeedback keiko”. I love the notion of different path of learning allowing one to augment their practice. Thanks for writing!

    Reply
  2. From a great Facebook question by Michael Schwartz: “guy, could you please explain a little bit more of exactly what sensei is doing here? what is the intention of your attack? how is he compromising your structure? are you being forced to take ukemi, or could you easily adjust your structure and maintain your balance?”

    In order to clarify what was happening in the video and how it pertains to the article, I’m posting my response here.
    “Michael, of course. It takes longer to describe than do! In the video, there are essentially three different levels/attacks sensei is asking from me. On the static ones – such as when I am holding a punch kamae, my goal is simply to try to not be bent or moved, and if I am, to regain my balance. Specifically, it is to keep the fist (or grip) immobilized, and if it is moved, to put it back on center (just like the old sword extension exercise). Of course, I could go limp or walk away at any time, so it is definitely a kihon practice.

    The second version (not in chronological order) is to enter and punch sensei in the face. That’s essentially it – again, I could let my arm go limp as soon as sensei touches it, or I could “bail” immediately – but the difference here is important as because saotome sensei maintains a body presence where it feels very clear that if I as uke doesn’t maintain the connection, sensei will complete a strike to my head or neck. He isn’t pushing “down” per se, he has a center-to-center presence where the punching hand (off the line / awkward as it becomes) becomes the only thing uke has to keep nage’s counterstrike away from uke’s face.

    The third version is with the kumitachi (sword) at the beginning. In this, sensei is holding defensive chuden kamae (middle stance), and I am performing tachiware – sometimes call the “beat thrust” attack, the goal of which is to clear nage’s weapon out of the way as part of a smooth thrust up the centerline. It is not two moves, and an important part is to cultivate *not* overcorrecting or overcutting past the centerline. However, sensei has great timing and center presence, so it’s tough not to instinctively try to adapt the thrust to be able to “break through” what feels like a tough defense, which disappears at a point timed to “cut uke’s ki” (split their intention/attention).

    Admittedly, I’m not approaching sensei on any of these exercises with a kumite / outwitting mindset, I’m not trying to trick my way in (although sensei wouldn’t object to a clean and honest counter if I could manifest one). With foreknowledge of what he is doing, I suppose I could try to just outmass him on some of the techniques, or just try to speed-spar with him. While I have tagged and countered sensei in the past, I’ve never really succeeded in trading punches with him. So for the most part I’m just trying to give a clear, fast or strong (depending), committed attack which does not “agree with” whatever I feel him trying to do. If he pushes me offline, I try to push back to get back online, etc.”

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *